PART I
PART II

Meeting the Need:
Providing Off-Leash Recreational Space
in Santa Barbara

A position paper prepared by the nonprofit
membership organization:

dogpacsb@yahoo.com


PART II

VII. Dog PAC, SB Recommendations to the Dog Subcommittee

  1. Historic Use
  2. Demographic Data
  3. Diversity of Location and Terrain
  4. Appropriateness for Off-leash Exercise
  5. Park Recommendations

VIII. Endnotes


Dog PAC, SB Recommendations

Dog PAC proposes that the City designate specific parks and public areas as appropriate for off-leash exercise and training of dogs. The recommendation of particular parks is based on four criteria: historic use, demographic data, diversity of location and terrain, and appropriateness of individual spaces for off-leash dogs.

Historic Use

Dog owners have enjoyed Santa Barbara’s parks and beaches for generations, often exercising and training their dogs without leashes in these areas. One valuable by-product of this fact is that through their consistent use dog owners have established areas where the off-leash exercise of dogs is normative. Through a long process of trial and error, dog owners have learned which locations are appropriate – and which are not – for off-leash dog exercise.

back to top

Factors contributing to the establishment of "dog appropriate" areas are public safety, dog safety, the accommodation of multiple user populations, the variety of terrains, and population density. Thus, there are many lessons to be learned from the historic dog use patterns of Santa Barbara’s public areas. These lessons should be treated as a resource in determining which parks are appropriate for off-leash exercise of dogs. Doing so will facilitate a smooth transition of public areas and make public education efforts easier, introducing minimal changes in the park system in general.

In a survey of Dog PAC members, such historic use data were collected. Members were asked to list the parks where they most often took their dogs for off-leash training, socialization, and exercise. It is important to note that while these data are indicative of Dog PAC members, they may not be generalizeable to the entire dog population. Table 1 summarizes the responses.

Table 1. The top 20 city of Santa Barbara public parks
and areas most frequently reported as used for off-leash
exercise of dogs [data from survey of Dog PAC members].

Name of Public Area Ranking of Use of Area
Arroyo Burro Beach 1
Douglas Family Preserve 2
Mission / Rose Garden 3
Mackenzie Park 4
Las Positas Park 5
Area Hiking Trails 6
Own Neighborhood 7
Oak Park 8
Leadbetter Beach 9
La Mesa Park 10
Shoreline Park 11
Alameda Park 12
Mesa Lane Steps 13
Andree Clark Bird Refuge 14
East Beach 15
Chase Palm Park 16
Franceschi Park 17
Parma Park 18
Sunflower Park 19
Pershing Park 20

back to top

Demographic Data

The American Veterinary Medical Association calculates that 32% of California households have dogs. A recent Gallup poll found that 45% of homes in the United States have dogs, with over half of the households in the most heavily dog populated states of Texas and California having at least one dog. Thus, estimates of the percentage of households with dogs in California range from approximately one-third to one-half. Combining these estimates with U.S. Census data, this translates to a conservative estimate of approximately 156,000 dog owners in Santa Barbara county. (4) The estimated number of dog owners in the city of Santa Barbara is nearly 37,000, with approximately 25,000 dogs currently living within the city limits.

Such large numbers of dogs and dog owners require an open space plan that recognizes the potential effect of a large number of dogs and accommodates their special needs appropriately. Simply put, dog owners need open space for off-leash dog exercise in a fair proportion to their numbers: this would translate to between 32% and 50% (between 18 and 28 of the city’s 55 parks) of Santa Barbara’s parks and open spaces.

back to top

Diversity of Location and Terrain

Among the considerations that must be taken into account when determining which parks and public areas are to be designated for the legal off-leash exercise of dogs are the diversity of location and terrain. Diversifying the locations of off-leash parks helps to guard against dog overcrowding, to lessen the impact of vehicle parking problems, and to enable more members of the community access to a park within a reasonable distance of their own home. Such considerations are particularly important to the elderly and to less mobile citizens.

Diversity of terrain is important to dogs and to dog owners. All dogs do not have the same needs. For example, dogs bred to run (e.g., Greyhounds) need large open spaces to do so. Dogs who are naturally water dogs (e.g., Golden Retrievers) need access to water in order to get proper exercise. In addition, dog owners themselves have varying ways of recreating with their dogs in open space, and differing abilities to enjoy areas that may prove physically challenging to access.

It is not reasonable to expect that all of these concerns – convenient access, diversity of locations, and variety of terrain – can be met perfectly for all community residents. However, a strategy that embraces the principles behind these types of access can go a long way toward accommodating the vast majority of dog owners.

One effective strategy for accommodating dog owners’ needs is to attempt to provide a hierarchy of open space options that provides dogs and their owners daily, regular, and occasional use areas for off-leash dog exercise and training. By doing so, we can take a creative approach toward providing park and public area access that considers the needs of dog owners.

Daily opportunities should be scattered throughout the community. Daily areas are those that provide everyone the opportunity to access an open, public space within a reasonable walking distance from one’s home. Demographic data must be considered in choosing such areas in order to ensure that such parks are readily accessible regardless of where one lives.

Parks providing regular opportunities may be spread more widely apart, perhaps within a short drive or long walk from one’s residence. Such areas are intended to accommodate dogs with special needs (e.g., especially active or water dogs that require large open areas or water access) that may or may not be readily available in one’s own neighborhood. In this way, regular areas accommodate a diversity of terrains that may be required for different breeds and types of dogs.

Occasional use areas are non-typical areas where the needs of dogs and dog owners are more heavily catered to. Such areas might boast of specific resources (e.g., dog wash facilities) that accommodate dogs and offer special services to dog owners. These areas provide dog owners with quite specific facilities for dogs that accommodate large dog populations.

back to top

In order to identify the distribution of dogs in Santa Barbara, dog registration data were analyzed and sorted by the geographic indicator of postal zip codes. Such an analysis provides a reasonably accurate overview of dog population by geographic location which, in turn, suggests where off-leash parks should be located in order to provide dog owners park access within a reasonable distance of their homes. Figure 1 summarizes these findings.

Figure 1
Percent of Dog Population by Zip Code
93105 27%
93108 4% (includes county land)
93110 3%
93109 19%
93101 26%
93103 21% (includes county land)

[source: City of Santa Barbara, Animal Control data]

Figure 1 reveals that dog ownership is relatively evenly distributed, especially when considering the size of the postal zip code areas. The apparent exception to this is in the downtown area (zip code 93101), where there is a large concentration of dogs in a relatively small area. In addition, it is worth noting that three of the four most heavily populated zip codes border the beach. These data suggest that (a) off-leash dog areas should be spread throughout the city in order to provide space for dog owners living in all areas and (b) a large proportion of dog owners could benefit from off-leash, beachfront open spaces.

back to top

Appropriateness for Off-leash Exercise

All spaces are not created equal, nor are all parks and public spaces appropriate for dogs without a leash. Consideration of traditional park uses and safety to dogs are factors that make certain areas generally inappropriate for dogs without a leash. For example, the Andree Clark Bird Refuge is not an appropriate location for off-leash dogs, given the potential conflict with bird populations. Such considerations should be taken into account when selecting parks and open spaces that are dog-appropriate.

Specific Park Recommendations

Based on historic use, appropriateness for off-leash exercise, demographic data, and diversity of location and terrain, the following public areas are recommended as appropriate for off-leash exercise and training of dogs in Santa Barbara.

A. Parks and areas recommended as appropriate for off-leash dogs:
1000 Steps Mission / Rose Garden Park
Alameda Park (south half) Oak Park
All hiking trails Ortega Park
Bohnett Park Parma Park
Douglas Family Preserve Pershing Park
East Beach Rattlesnake Canyon
Franceschi Park San Roque Park
Hilda Ray Park Shoreline Park
Honda Valley Park Skofield Park
La Mesa Park Steven’s Park
Mackenzie Park Thornbury Park
Mesa Lane Steps Beach area: the section of beach from the bottom of the steps of Shoreline Park to the western city limit

B. Parks and areas recommended as inappropriate for off-leash dogs:
Alameda Park (north half) Loma Media
Alice Keck Park Memorial Garden Los Robles Area
Ambassador Park Morton Bay Fig Tree
Andree Clark Bird Refuge Orpet
Cabrillo Ball Field / Pavilion Pilgrim Terrace
Chase Palm Park Rancheria Garden
De La Guerra Plaza Spencer Adams
Eastside Neighborhood Park Storke Plaza
Equestrian Circle Sunflower Park
Gould Park Sylvan
La Coronilla Vera Cruz
Laurel Canyon West Beach
Leadbetter Beach -

back to top

Establishing off-leash areas at several appropriate parks serves all members of the community by (a) accommodating dog owners in an evenhanded and balanced manner and (b) leaving the vast majority of parks with leash requirements, in consideration of those why may have a preference for leashed dogs.

It should be noted that although Dog PAC, SB offers the above list of parks as those appropriate for off-leash dogs, it is not a list of our own members’ preferences. Reconciling the list of appropriate parks with those where our members most frequently take their dogs will show that we have attempted to avoid biases in our choice of parks. Instead, as stated, areas recommended as appropriate for off-leash exercise are based on which parks best address the needs of the community as a whole.

back to top


Part II Endnotes

4. The following data were used in the estimation of dog and dog owner populations for the city and county of Santa Barbara:

back to top

Santa Barbara County

(a) Population: 381,401 [source: 1996 US Census data]

(b) Average Household Size: 2.84 [source: 1990 US Census data]

(c) Number of Households: 134,296 [source: calculation; (a / b)]

(d) % of households with dogs: 41% [source: mean of estimates by (a) the American Veterinary Medical Association, which estimates that 32% of households have dogs and (b) Gallup poll estimate that over 50% of households in California have at least one dog.]

(e) Number of households with dogs: 55,061 [source: calculation; (c * d)]

(f) Number of dog owners: 156,373 [source: calculation; (b * e)]

(g) Number of dogs per dog-owning household: 1.96 [source: American Veterinary Medical Association]

(h) Number of dogs: 107,919 [source: calculation; (e * g)]

back to top

The City of Santa Barbara

(a) Population: 90,200 [source: Santa Barbara News-Press]

(b) Average Household Size: 2.84 [source: 1990 US Census data]

(c) Number of Households: 31,761 [source: calculation; (a / b)]\

(d) % of households with dogs: 41% [source: mean of estimates by (a) the American Veterinary Medical Association, which estimates that 32% of households have dogs and (b) Gallup poll estimate that over 50% of households in California have at least one dog.]

(e) Number of households with dogs: 13,022 [source: calculation; (c * d)]

(f) Number of dog owners: 36,982 [source: calculation; (b * e)]

(g) Number of dogs per dog-owning household: 1.96 [source: American Veterinary Medical Association]

(h) Number of dogs: 25,523 [source: calculation; (e * g)]

4. Please refer to endnote 3 for these and other demographic data.

back to top